Now should you lose on both spins you still have 187.5$ to play with and you can place 20.833333$ on any nine numbers and should you be a winner you will get 750$ which is equal to your 500 original capital plus 250$ in winning which was your goal. However, should you lose you can now bet187.5$ on the same dozen and should you be a winner you will win 375$ which will get you the 250$ and the 125$ you lost on the previous spin. Option (B): Place 125 on any one dozen and should you be a winner you will win 250$ and walk away.

The probabilty of that happening is 24/37=(.648648). What’s your opinion on these systems? And do you think I should try them out?ĭear Sir, In a single zero roulette game, the PROBABILTY of winning increases if you place a portion of your money on fewer numbers for more spins versus covering more numbers per spin, an example: If you are willing to risk 500$ in order to win 250$ then you could: Option (A): place 250$ on any of two dozen and should you be a winner you will win 250$. I mean, beating these testbooks have to mean something. Now, I must say I’m still a bit sceptical about spending money on these systems, but since they've proved themselves over the long haul, I can't really see no reason why I shouldn’t. The second one is Don Young’s roulette system which is verified to beat the Roulette System Tester from Zumma Publishing(15000 spins). The system was tested and developed in conjunction with' Spin roultte Gold' by Frank Scoblete and 'Roulette system tester' by Eric St. The first one is the 3q/A-strategy found in R.D Ellison’s book 'Gamble to win: Roulette', which has a verified win rate of 7.94% (7500 spins). I’ve been an avid roulette gambler for some years now and for the first time ever I’m thinking of trying out a roulette system.Now I know how you feel about these so called 'systems' and the scammers behind them, and belive me, I feel the same way, but I’ve come across two systems which can’t be ignored.

Paddy power roulette minimum bet